Archive for the ‘comercial’ Category

The biological network in the technology race

July 3, 2015

I was watching this short video

Fascinating stuff. The evil of technology is in that we *have to* learn. We have no choice. We have to anticipate the problems to the best of our abilities and address them in time or face incredibly harsh punishments. When nature unleashes the punishments it is often not known if we could have done something but it isn’t rare for the solution to be sitting there on the shelve for years without anyone caring what it is. If we don’t understand the situation we cant understand the problems or the solutions.

Take where it is argued that the automobile didn’t mean we all have to be engineers. He portrays the automobile as a single component. The invention was not the chair, it was not to put wheels on carts, it was not new to move cargo on a vehicle. The invention he is really referring to is the combustion engine. A better context would be engines in general. Everything from wind turbines, water wheels, steam and pneumatics to electric, gas and petrol engines. At first slowly but then increasingly rapidly we’ve replaced human labor with these powerful prime movers.

If people are not familiar with how these things work they wont understand how the world around them functions. Just like we have today it can only result in a society where billions are detached from reality. We need all of those people to govern themselves, we need for their opinion to be valuable. If they are unfamiliar with that what sustains them others can tell them any amount of stories and they will believe them. Self governing ends right there.

Take the electric car, it was invented in the early 1800’s and it held all speed records up to 1900. This while I suspect most people think the automobile was invented in the early 1900. People continued to build electric cars but lying to the general publicΒ  prevailed up to today. The first electric train was from 1879 the first electric tram in 1881. Trains with combustion engines are useful but electric magnetic levitation trains are that much more efficient and that much faster.

You have to think of an automobile as an indivisible unit to think that a tram or aΒ  train is something different. It might be worthy of a special name if you put just 5 chairs on it and rubber bands over the wheels but to argue that this is the point where electricity stops being a viable solution is completely silly.

We use our many types of engines all over the place. To cool your computer, to mow the lawn, to open the garage door and to propel the industrial revolution. Today robots and artificial intelligence are playing an ever increasing role in society.

If it was true that people don’t have to understand any of it we will soon be reduced to a kind of pet in the most literal sense. Fast forwards a bit to the point where machines do everything, they hand us food and make our bed, shave you, put on your pants. From the other end, like with electronics, car engines and processors corporations will seal the components into lego like building blocks while promoting the idea that you should not know how things work.

If we are not careful we really can (and will) build a society where nothing is for you to know.

To take the amazon example. If everyone had a basic understanding of the technology we would have build a distributed system where the book store would be a node in the network. With a basic understanding it would be entirely obvious that a central control for profit at the expense of librarians and other literature professionals is undesirable.

As a direct result of our mistake Amazon purchased those nice little warehouse robots making them unavailable for everyone else.

They’ve hired part of the small group of people who understand how things work and now they own a large chunk of society. A large chunk of *our* society. That people don’t understand this doesn’t make it ok.

He speaks of time. Assaulting time. It is absolutely true that Amazon is able to deliver things faster than anyone else. But that is just a marketing component to them. They are not in the race to set the best time possible but their goal is to finish first.

A collective effort can gradually improve everything simply for the sake of improvement. For amazon it has to first make financial sense to focus on that area. They only have a tiny group of people working for them, they have to chose what to work on. Most will be in warehouses picking orders.

Commercial enterprise can barely get a rocket to ISS while collective efforts are approaching Pluto.

When space x figures out how to launch rockets reliably they could freeze the technology and work on other aspects of their business.

One day there will be a commercial space station and a commercial mission to Pluto.

By that time the collective effort will have bases on the moon and on mars and we will have rovers on Pluto.

The rovers will be complicated and their components will be complicated but those components will be made from simple mechanical contraptions that a child could understand. It will likely have a solar panel, a battery and an electric motor. A familiar computer with input and output devices.

If amazon had a publicly supported competitor and I had anything to say about it we would have digital copies of all books accessible before the hard-copy arrives in the mail. It could eventually be printed locally – it would defeat amazons delivery speed twice. We would have a debate how to properly reward living authors and reward librarians, we could run pilots side by side.

If people would understand technology we would have to wonder why we need google to find documents on-line. Google should definitely have a place on the web but to fully depend on commercial search providers results in poor search results and it gives them way to much power. They will seal their technology into components and keep it a secret just like all those commercial efforts before them. They will control what you get to read and what you wont get to read. They will closely monitor everything you do on-line. It is not unfair to say they can do whatever they like.

A crucial ingredient is for the general public not to know how simple it is to make a search engine.

The user types some words, they are send to other computers that will forward them again to many others. The words are compared to the index and the results are send back the same way.

The challenge is to sort the results by quality. A public debate about this is extremely important. Who is to decide which pages the general public should be reading OR more importantly who gets to decide which pages the public should not read?

Corporate interests? Must be kidding? I’m sure you can already picture what a joke that is. Google has been extremely nice to us in that regard. We should be glad we have such a benevolent information dictator.

Collectively we could do so much better than to sort search results by popularity as if that would be the ultimate measure of quality. The idea is easily debunked by the lack of sources popular articles cite. Citations after all end up promoting other websites other websites from the one the author is working for. The news article about Joe becomes a direct competitor of Joe’s homepage.

This is also why people are not making websites anymore. If we refuse to make an index that respects our hard worked articles it is no longer worth writing them.

This is how other realms of thoughts are being pushed out.

In short, programming is the reading and writing of the 21th century.

Arguing one doesn’t have to know how it works is equal to promoting illiteracy.

Advertisements

The glorious explanation why all TAX is nonsense

May 14, 2015

Thinking about this a bit more I now think it is crazy that government is not self sufficient. It should be cranking out products and it should be selling those to the rest of the world.

Free market capitalism has obvious advantages over government organizations. Efficiency and innovation seem the most relevant 2. The most profitable sectors that are not innovating should just be seized by the state. If it creates a global monopoly some 10-20% private ownership should be enough to keep up innovation and efficiency up to date.

(note: all governments are legally able to seize assets in times of war. Therefore all it takes is one of those fake wars)

You could even print currency against the new state assets and buy everything or offer limited compensation.

Run the proverbial government corn for a few years, make a nice report about the success of the project then either continue or if it turns out to be a drama sell it back to the market for whatever it is worth.

If people use their money to complaint seize their personal assets. We are running a country, we should not care about the benefits of the few if it gets in the way of the benefits of the many.

I would, overnight, put bars, restaurants, casinos, dance floors and [for profit] conference rooms in all government buildings. If the paper work gets in the way of serving drinks we should work hard to automate it into oblivion.

In a few years they would also have supermarkets, a hotel, sell clothing, furniture, electronics and cut peoples hair. Prices tuned to match local competition.

I would easily pay all the bills, then I would buy public support first by giving people free meals and free drinks every week and later with a heavily localized revenue sharing model.

I would send tickets to government officials from all over the world to do my advertising for me. I would invite the whole town to help show this guy from Japan what a wonderful thing we have going on here.

Soon after the supermarkets I would start local farms and local manufacturing. Buying things in bulk then doing a bit of repackaging is not rocket science. It will have the label people trust and have learned to love.

I would invite local people to participate in tuning and expanding this glorious project, it will be a court like setting where we first denounce their lack of vision then physically remove them if they so much as try one of those destructive narcissistic “everything is impossible” rants.

Most topics will have a ton of data from around the country and where we lack such data we can take pride in being on the cutting edge of things. Failure is entirely acceptable. We get to try things again and again and again until we get it right.

If people want 3 different kinds of peppers we are going to put effort in growing them in stead of listening to someone who doesn’t believe that is even possible.

He will get 5 minutes to describe his experience with the failure of growing peppers, if it is not a convincing story he is thrown out of the building.

Never again will government gardens grow unproductive crops and planting trees without fruits will require a lot of explaining. We will garden on walls, on roofs, by the side of the road, on fields nearby and indoors.

There will be chickens, pigs and cows in the park.

We will purge cars from the city and replace them with electrically assisted aerodynamic recumbent bicycles, to avoid giant batteries and limited range there will be charge strips by every traffic light and by the side of the road. The power surge will be negotiated wirelessly for maximum safety. Likewise a maximum speed will be electronically enforced. Pedaling harder will just reduce electrical assist or be consumed for battery charging.

Then, after inevitable success we will sell this system to every country around the world. Build and train their local manufacturing of the same. Teach them how to mold the aerodynamic body, how to wind and wire those electric motors, how to wire the underground battery to the wind turbine or solar array, if available how to hook up the grid failback and how to map the charge points on the gps.

It will send tremors across the global political sphere. As if dropped in icy water politicians around the world will wake up from their slumber of gay marriage, perpetual austerity and wars on terra.

They will find themselves completely outclassed, if not out right transcended.

Then, at the moment of maximum confusion I will create a monetary system where every tangible asset available for purchase is considered money.

To do this we will have a completely automated forex exchange system that allows trade, the way it was before the days of ancient Egypt and before Summer, to reemerge.

The ancient riddle where trading a cow for a bag of grain was considered complicated. The word of interest is “complicated” as it describes both the problem and the person having it.

I’m doing the impossible already, miracles take a little bit longer and “complicated” makes me shake from laughter.

Traditional currency will be used as a reference point, to pay taxes (in the unlikely event such a thing as tax would still exist), to pay national debt, for complex trades, monetary reserves and for trading with primitive nations.

The basic idea is this. You own a bicycle, if you own 51% of it you get to decide how it is used. Other people can buy part of your bicycle and trade that part for other goods but the bicycle will eventually perish along with the currency created against it.

If a city grows 10 Euro worth of tomatoes it can buy things for this 10 Euro but unless someone shows up to exchange the currency for tomatoes directly the currency will perish along with the fruit.

If you own 100% of a bicycle the automatic forex exchange will conveniently allow you to purchase say 10 Euro worth of tomatoes for only 8 Euro worth of bicycle, as bicycles are far less perishable than fruits.

Likewise the 8 Euro worth of bicycle could buy 4 Euro worth of gold.

People in the city can get that part of their salary in tomatoes, the part they plan to spend on food anyway. 10 Euro of fruits buys 10 Euro of other fruits quite dependably.

If you fail to trade or collect your tomatoes the money will simply perish.

When you chose to sell your bicycle (that is a registered asset) the future owner can buy 49% on the exchange and pay you in 2% in bananas or he can purchase your 51% directly, whichever is cheaper or more attractive.

If you refuse to sell your 2% the value of your bicycle as a currency also drops and you get a bad review as a trader. A better idea would be to purchase a new one with your 51% bicycle money.

You will effectively be forced into trading which will serve both to teach you and to create cash flow. The Forex application is a fair game for everyone to play. Software will be written to tailor your assets to your personal lifestyle.

If you want to take risks with perishable goods you can earn a ton of money by holding onto the tomatoes for a few hours.

If you want more certainty you can buy gold, Euro, shares or a life time supply of toilet paper.

You take a picture of that chair you are sitting in, register it and poof! You get to spend 49% of it! The desk, the computer, the phone, the coffee pot.

You would have so much money all of a sudden that it boggles the mind.

When Ebay first launched it had a lot of traders who didn’t understand why people would pay so much for their items.

That coffee pot of yours is long out of production and there is someone out there who use to own one just like that. Depending how much emotional value they have invested in it you might be willing to part with it.

If you chose to do so it will add value to everything else you own. Depending on the amount of successful trades your desk chair will be worth more than the exact same chair owned by someone else.

It may come as a shock but the way the art market works, you can simply pay someone to buy your paintings and artificially pump the value of all your works. When art traders insist they are really worth that much you have no further say in it. You should probably make some more.

More legitimately, you should make some more of that pottery, grow some more of those flowers – if that is what people want from you who are you to refuse?

If you want to own 100% of what you own and get paid in Euroes that should certainly be an option. You can hardly object to the fact that the cookie factory that employs you can afford a much higher salary if they can pay part of it in cookies. They can also arrange deals with other businesses to trade some cookies for fresh fish, tomatoes and electric razors.

They could create a highly complex package of things and pay you in exactly those currencies. The guaranteed business and cutting out all the middle men would create unbelievably efficient deals.

If you don’t want it you have to change the currencies to other coins with a slight loss and they have to sell the box to someone else thus making it even cheaper.

Someone is going to want an electric razor soon enough, you don’t have to drop your razor money offer far below the market price to change it into something else.

The system will have some quirks and some growth pains but generally everyone will have so much wealth it hardly matters.

If someone is trying to game the system, hoard some good or is trying to influence the market negatively some other way [with intend] the state can simply seize part of that property and redistribute it with or without punishment or compensation.

We are not falling for the trick of wealth being used to deprive others ever again. The response should be so harsh that one wouldn’t dare consider it.

Over time local organization will suffer the conditioning of constructive thought. We shall then give them some room to play with experimental local law making. If good ideas arise they should propagate sidewards to other towns and downwards towards regions, nation wide politics and yes, global implementation of good ideas must also follow.

They can buy our mojo and learn to be awesome just like us.

You can already start by getting over your anti-innovation indoctrination. The romans build roads and aqueducts and you, with all the tools available to you, cant even punch a dent in a pack of butter. If drinking water out of the tap was a new idea you would be against it. If solar was a new idea you would go out of your way getting in the way of it.

It has nothing to do with the topic, it is that you’ve been indoctrinated to be against everything in order to prevent society from rising up against its owners.

Of course you are also against a currency backed by tangible assets, you would prefer fiat currency and austerity every time.

You will be against it until large volumes of money start flowing though your bank account. At that point you wont dare express your negativity publicly and point and laugh at anyone who does.

You have to fight this sadistic pleasure you get from the idea Tesla was prevented from providing free electricity to everyone.

You have to wake up to the idea that the war industry is the biggest industry in the world. The idea that all of your wealth is pumped into a dead end for the purpose of hurting people.

Picture a world where your wealth, however large it might be, will be many times larger.

Now imagine yourself to be the prime actor in fighting to prevent that. If you (collectively) are the only one who can change it it automatically becomes your responsibility for not making it happen.

I have no way of knowing how far or how long ago you’ve detached yourself emotionally from the wellbeing of others, if you can still remember it or if the concept is entirely alien to you. Just remember, your comfort zone is a very small place where few exciting things happen. In stead of focusing on fear of the unknown consider that awesome things may happen. Humanity should stop being such a fearful bunch of cowards. It doesn’t look good on us. Look at all the weapons we build! HA-HA We that afraid eh? Preposterous.

Thanks for your time, may you pay a lot of taxes, good luck with the war on everything and may the force be with you!

paper view

November 15, 2005

Advertising is a big industry, we can use add supported services, we can earn money by having others click on our adds, we can even earn money with viewing adds in some programs.

I like to think “free” means something sucks. I sure know great free services but if they offer a payed product it almost always is better as..

I also think the person viewing the adds is doing the work. An add powered service may appear free, in reality they earn add revenue. This may or may not be more as enough it doesn’t matter, it’s still the viewers money in the developers pocket. I figure we are old enough to buy our own things? We are more as capable to judge and pay what things cost.

Now that made me think… “What if free things could be dramatically improved by charging a small fee?”

I imagine a blog posting could cost money. 50 cent or 2 € for posting it – that would be something I could afford.

I imagine a page stuffed with advertisement would be acceptable if the viewer earns money by viewing it.

– just the 2 ideas so far would mean A Blogger has to visit 3-20 blogs to earn back his posting. I would be even more motivated to view the new posts knowing the bloggers payed to post em.

I imagine a comment could cost 10 cent? Why not? It sounds like it makes sense? no?

If a comment would cost 5 € I would expect a serious reply? If that doesn’t appear others can see how it doesn’t. Deleting a comment should return the credit to it’s owner.

Google questions works some whut like that but that community is build from people in the mood to be helped or in the mood to be payed.

For bloggers it would only present some means to be taken more seriously.

I can’t help but think that a lot of people would be happy to earn a few coins by viewing your blog. Just imagine earning 20 cents by reading this posting. That would be fun! (Google makes around 5$ for each search result you view)

Not-free could also mean getting payed for writing posts. I’ve seen programs offer 300 000 articles about almost any subject, reading those mass generated writings gave me the shivers. It was cold and death-boring content, really scary! So, I figure paying to post and earning by reading could be a formula. Greedy people can shut up and serious questions can be answered.

For example:
Say it costs 2$ per post, we only have 10 adds per page, and a page view earns 20 cent.

20 cent divided by 10 adds is 2 cent. 2$ divided by 2 cents is 100 adds.

For the add we make a short introduction of our post, possibly with a small image. Then the viewer earns 2 cent for viewing your add and makes another 20 cent by clicking it.

We are not in a hurry so the 100 adds could take a few months to run out. That way the service can create a buffer to balance out the flow.

The advertisers have already payed you 2 cent, you don’t need to click their add. Still if you want you can.

This way it would be easy to store the add-click history and make it search-able for the user.

Building a safe payment system is so hard that filtering out automated surfers before payday is relatively easy. A few simple questions like “click the green dot” will do the trick. If human verification is slow it will happen more often. Posting a comment should be proof enough of being a real person. If the cash balance is low we also ask less questions. If you earn 20 bucks per day you will have to view the pages a bit longer and click few more dots. On the other hand, a user spending more as he earns should not have to do reality check ups.

Some bloggers have far to little to eat, other bloggers have far to few readers for the size of their budget.

Sure, people will create sweat shops to read our blogs. Do we really care? I love the idea people could make a living by reading this shit I write. That would rock the banana boat.

A friend of mine called it a service for rich snobs. I think she forgot we are the rich snobs on this planet. So, lets get your fat lazy ass into the comment box and write a few words for our sweat shoppers. You are obviously not willing to pay them 2 cent each, the least you can do is make a fool out of yourselves here. πŸ˜€

Yahoo comments

Freelance your blog skills

October 31, 2005

People will hate your blog if you don’t get it right. πŸ˜†

Besides from being to lazy to do anything I have a perfect picture of how you makes professional blogs happen.

The quality content you need requires lots of work. If the work is un-cool you will hate doing it. πŸ˜† This means you need to find a commercial subject in the second place and a fun subject in the first. Only make a porn blog if you’re a pervert.

The hard part is finding the right kind of sponsor. Clicks on advertisement does not go anywhere as fast as selling Mercedes.

Find businesses that make money around your fun subjects. If no one is making money with something related to your hobby you need to look again because your doing something wrong. Open the eyes maybe.

You imagine what kind of people buy their type of products. What information are they looking for on the web? Then you make a new blog and create 5 posts in it. The title of the posts should explain what information is inside the post. For this text here a “Freelance your blog skills” would be ok.

For the first page view it doesn’t matter if the post sucks. Only the title makes the visitor view the posting. Only good content will get your visitor to visits your blog again.

Then you can already contact the businesses and just ask them if they want your blog to be part of their website. You just move your blog to a sub-domain of their business site.

Don’t hesitate to make jokes about them just having a phone number and items for sale. 99% of those sites offers no fresh & interesting content.

Make some trial deal, use your own money to buy google ad words. Advertise your blog for free on related sites. Then work like a slave day and night to write a (draft) post about every single subject your blog could have a post about.

What are the customers looking to accomplish?

You don’t need to help them at all, just make a soap like adventure about yourself trying to find out how to answerer your own questions. “as I was looking for Mercedes desktop themes I found the following sites….bla bla….” But keep updating that post! One day the post will list all Mercedes-desktop-theme-sites on the web.

A sexy way to obtain mass traffic of the right kind is by searching for questions people ask in forums. Write a good reply in your blog and give them a link like here:

http://www.bloggerforum.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=8648&forum=10

Getting extra cash, traffic and work true referal programs is cool but their banners and links back look nasty and you do have to promote them. You advertise a the program without adding a link to it. In stead offer a link to more information.Thats the WIN-WIN combo!

β€’ You need whole articles to support your referral programs. + They are never good enough, NEVER!

β€’ The “selling products” is the pipe dream of the formula.

β€’ What you need is a lot of successful referrals under you.

putting their name in the box “to be your referral” is one thing, they won’t make a cent from just doing that. Just like you wont! πŸ˜† Say you have a fairly ordinary blog like this one:

http://usavisa.blogspot.com
(This is one of my test blogs)

If you visit and click around a bit like a real visitor. You will spot a little 468 banner where I advertise a blog with all of those referral articles.

So, you make a blog about making money ayou may advertise it by your own TOS! Anything goes! (well almost) did you ever make money online? See any referral links in that? “nope non” Do you expect to see any on the page? “yes, lots with lots of info”. It’s the least annoying. on http://categories.blogspot.com Non of the banners rotating make me any cash. You can just click em, it’s ok. πŸ™‚

I can participate in a whole lot of referral programs and advertise them properly. BUT I will never have to stalk people who are not interested! I was using the smallest adds and they made me angry as they are just as distracting as the big kind.

The whole separate blog is a winner formula. If you want me to do something, give me a whole page about how I’m going to do this and make it look half good. Don’t put to much effort in it, we will hate you for that, it’s just for cleaning up the original blog and for nothing else, well almost. πŸ˜† We want a clean blog but we also want to keep the door open for traffic and cash making programs.

quote: RobbD3
What is the proper etiquette when it comes to using affiliate links on your blog or in message forums?

Lets see you investigate this in a that blog.

Should they always be labeled as such?

YES!

Are there times when it is O.K. to use an affiliate link without telling your audience that it is an affiliate link?

NO! You are looking for loving and caring referrals. πŸ˜†

I am kind of on the fence on this one. In some cases your credibility can take a hit because your entire post that has the affiliate link may be viewed as an ad.

Then stop the denial and make it so.

In other cases you may not care if the link is an affiliate link or not because going to the URL in the link is the reason for reading the post in the first place.

lol, you could add popups to links so they look as if they are part of the site linked to. You can expect me to remove all links to you the moment I find out. It’s like comming over for a beer and pulling out a vacuum cleaner and start selling it to me. Yeah, you may succeed but who cares? Why not ask me if you can show the machine and say some things about it first.

I figure it would be fun to see the lot of blog publishers make a lot of money to. I’m gonna go figure it all out for all of you. I don’t really care if you become my referral, I’m just looking for readers and this appears a popular topic. 😎

Blogger comments | Yahoo comments